| Author |
Topic: The Matrix as Messiah Movie Part 3
|
cecilc
Member |
posted
04-27-99 07:33 AM
As per requests,...we start Part 3 of this thread. Thanks for the
suggestion ... it was needed!
For the original thread:
http://wbboards.warnerbros.com/ultimate/files/Forum68/HTML/000052.html
For Part II:
http://wbboards.warnerbros.com/ultimate/files/Forum68/HTML/000750.html
To all,...Thanks! |
acrobat
Member |
posted
04-27-99 07:53 AM
OnFyre4God!
I like your style, friend!
There is but ONE Jesus! ONE way!
------------------
He who has ears to hear, let him hear. |
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-27-99 08:23 AM
GUESS I TOUCHED A NERVE! Didn't mean to offend, if I did, but I'm
glad to hear from everyone!
OnFyre4God:
Okay -- message received loud and clear. You may not want to ruffle feathers, but when you
proclaim that the only way to believe is YOUR way, it sorta gets me going.
First of all, I want to say that faith as strong as yours in ANY form is a powerful and
wonderful thing -- there is nothing better in this world than spreading positivity and
understanding of the higher power. I just don't subscribe to the idea that there is BUT
ONE religion that is COMPLETELY correct. I'm not doubting Christ's teachings, just whether
or not he was the only one who had anything valuable to say. I think it becomes dangerous
when we start eliminating other people from grace and truth and compassion just because
they don't read the Bible, or whatever. It's the divisiveness in our world that causes
people to kill one another over things like borders, holy teachings, even slams on high
school kids with little or no reverence for their life or anyone else's. If we are to find
a way to come together and heal, we must stop fighting fire with fire -- the only way to
combat an absence (evil) is with a presence (faith). I have faith and know that my God
NEVER judges me (or anyone else) according to what book he/she reads or what church he/she
attends.
I HAVE taken the red pill, and it opened my eyes to the beauty
that is ALL around us. "The answer is out there Neo, it's looking for you. And it
will find you, if you want it to."
12321:
I guess my doctrine can be summed up like this: I believe there was/is/has always been one
all-encompassing higher power (GOD). That higher power, being perfection, could not know
itself as perfect because it had no reference point (you can't know what's hot if you
don't know cold -- you can't know perfection unless you know imperfection). Therefore, it
created us as individual aspects of itself by which it could experience all the limits of
every emotion and experience known and unknown. Each of us is bound to the higher power by
its representation in each of us, our souls.
Our lives are spent experiencing things that lead us to the
knowledge of who we really are -- (which is to say, an actual component of the ultimate
higher power - i.e., a candle in the sun) and to the realization that we are all capable
of affecting the greater force by our thoughts, words, and deeds. Mind - body - spirit; my
personal trinity. What you put out there to the universe is what you will get back.
I simply do not believe organized religion can even begin to
touch on how big the picture really is. God is the ALL, the here and the there, the seen
and the unseen, the space in between empty spaces -- he doesn't care if you pray according
to Judiasm, Christianity, Catholocism, Taoism, Buddhism, in your back yard, Native
American beliefs, etc., etc., We have to stop sticking people in round or square holes
like pegs. There is no spoon -- free your mind.
BTW I recently read a book that changed my life (literally) and
it completely sums up what I am (rather poorly) trying to say. It is "Conversations
With God" by Neale Donald Walsch. I know, I know, most of you are probably rolling
your eyes (I hope not!) If you want a really enlightening look at a very engaging new (or
not so new) idea, give it a read (you may have to turn off the organized religion part of
your brain for a spell tho! ).
Sorry to babble on so much! Thanks for the feedback -- I HONESTLY
think this thread and ALL the things being expressed here are fascinating and I have
agreed with SO MUCH of what has been said. And I am in total agreement with the parallels
to the biblical teachings. Please don't think I'm trying to stir something up. This movie
was such a completely amazing piece of work, I'm glad other people got as much out of it
as I did!
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
12321
Member |
posted
04-27-99 09:36 AM
Thanks, Cecil.
And Im not sure if this is a tip or something you all know
about or already do [get to the point, Mike] but if you open those other threads and save
them as source youve got easy access to the Messiah Movie post archives and can read
em off line.
Now back to the movie... Im gonna see it for the third time
this Sunday. No note pad or tape recorder this time. Just sit back and enjoy. One of the
many details Im gonna watch for is the golden heart.
After Neo is flushed from his pod, the Neb deploys a line and
lifts him into the ship. A pool of water remains on Neos chest [sternum] and seemed
to shine with an odd intensity... the color and the shape made me think it may have been
an intentional element. Id not noticed it the first time. Did anyone else see this
or was I seeing something that wasnt really there?
Neophile-: You think and feel deeply. That you care and
dont wish to offend is just as obvious. But you cant point a finger without
poking yourself in the eye. Its like gravity. You drop a rock, its gonna hit
the ground. This is one of the things that Jesus [among others] tried to explain.
To you, OnFyres beliefs are divisive. You point out why.
Then you say your truth.
For the most part, the people here are truth seekers. We want to
know. We say that wed say yes to the red pill. Heck, most of us, myself included,
have claimed to have already taken it.
Were all definitely full of something, and it sure
aint red pills.
Each of us has our own truths and beliefs and questions, and
its good to discuss and share em, but that isnt the primary topic of
this thread. Maybe if we recognize and allow for these differences while we explore the
Messiah theme, well all see something new.
And if any of us claim to have all the answers, he/she better be prepared to back that up
by flying overhead.
Does this sound reasonable?
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
tracer
Member |
posted
04-27-99 09:57 AM
12321: Yes, I saw the "golden heart" you refer to. I
have noticed it all four times, and have wondered as to its significance or meaning. I'm
not convinced it is a pool of water, but I have no alternate suggestion to offer.
Puzzling... |
12321
Member |
posted
04-27-99 10:10 AM
tracer: The pool of water was just a guess. It may have been an
object affixed to Reeves for this single scene. If it's water, it'll move when they move
him. I'll watch close.
If it's not water, this's really an interesting element.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-27-99 11:40 AM
12321:
Yeah, I guess I finally get your point (I wasn't listening well enough before -- sorry!)
This thread is specifically about the link to the Messiah; gotcha now! Thanks!
I'm going on my sixth viewing of the film and I still can't
figure out what that thing is on Neo's chest. I thought it was just one of the places one
of the "plugs" hooked in, but he has two of those on his chest, to either side,
not one in the middle. I just don't know! I'll go again this weekend and see if I can
"divine" ( ) anything substantial!
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-27-99 11:49 AM
I must be getting old, I swear I submitted this reply, but it
never showed up!
Anyway . . .
12321:
My brain finally clicked into what you've been saying -- this thread in particular is only
about the Messiah aspect of the movie. I just got sidetracked on my own thang -- sorry.
As for the golden heart thing, I have seen the film 6 times and I
still don't know what it is. I thought it was one of the "plug-in" ports, but he
had two of those on his chest and in the scene you're questioning there is only one, right
in the middle. Looks like a makeup mistake, but I'm sure that's impossible in this movie
-- it must be dripping with meaning somehow!
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-27-99 11:51 AM
You know, I hate it when the computer makes you look like a total
idiot (not that I don't do a good enough job myself). Sorry 'bout the double entry!
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Metaconstrux
Member |
posted
04-27-99 12:19 PM
Lots of people have pointed out that Neo is a christ figure, that
Judeo-Cristian images and themes constanty crop up in the movie, and that the types of
resurections, revelations, and betrayals central to the New Testament are also central to
The Matrix.
These discussions place the movie BACK into a conventional
context in which it can be understood (and partially dismissed -- ohh, another Christ
image, how trite.) Perhaps it is more useful to see how the movie comments on religion and
how history and religion operate in the Matrix. Let's take an inside out perspective on
things, shall we?
The movie seems to suggest that before the triumph of the AI,
history existed as we know it, and that the world of the matrix is a perfect replica of
1999 (Sydney, Australia!).
But remember -- nothing in the matrix REALLY exists, especially history. History contructs
the Matrix's notions of truth, past, cause, effect, and justifications. These notions are
UNREAL twice over. They are still part of the AI programming, and they are PAST, gone,
unverifiable. History exists even less than breakfast cereal in the Matrix. So to have
'bibles' 'churches' and other historically determined symbols in the assembly language of
society is to create 'relics' that are avaliable to be picked up and used by those who
would wish to resist that society.
The AI, by precisely reproducing the present moment, have
relinquished control over that moment's history. We know that we can use the scraps of
programming language lying around in the Matrix to resist the AI (guns, telephones, subway
trains, etc.) To resist the AI you need to recombine the elements within the Matrix and
weild them against their makers.
This is why religion and mysticism are so important in processes
of resistance: you can use the power of these metaphors and archtypal constructs to
advance your agenda.
Neo HAS to be a hero -- he that goes beyond and comes back to enlighten the deluded (like
Plato's metaphore of the cave, or the Buddha's transcendence and return, or Christ's death
and resurection). Notions of moving beyond the limited consciousness of our existence are
FUNDAMENTALLY religious in nature. You could refuse to draw on these metaphors, and make
Neo into a renegade Schwartzenegger figure, but then you strip him of his justification as
the ONE to save AND enlighten MILLIONS of people. (Just like refusing to draw on the
programming language that makes bullets would render our renegade hero pretty damn
powerless.)
So Zion must be Zion -- a promised land that may survive because
humans have sought to establish and defend Zion throughout all of 'history.' Trinity must
in a sense be THE Trinity (even though most guy's think that the 'Trinity' or GOD is a
man) so that she can speak down to her beloved and raise him from the dead. And Neo must
be the ONE, tapping into the mythos of the construct in order to effectively alter it. If
a significant part of the population is actively waiting for the Second Comming and the
rest is a little nervous of the posability because they can not reject it outright, why
not USE that image? Why not USE religion just as one uses martial arts -- as a focusing of
the mind to transcend the world and alter it effectively?
Of course, more is at work here than just a calculated invocation
of the religious that is meant to destroy the AI. The oracle's words are powerful and true
even in the Real (aparently not simulated) World. Trinity can somehow speak to Neo from
across the divide. Which brings us to my next point.
In _this_ real world, when telling a story about resistence and
social transformation, why not USE religion as a dominant metaphor to persuade and
captivate your audiences? As a movie maker at the ass end of the twentieth century, what
conventions may you employ, what collectively held beliefs and knowledge can you reference
to move your audience? Religion is key.
So for all those who would criticise the Matrix as JUST another
religious alegory, I would only say -- The Matrix makes everything into allegory.
Everything represents something else. All symbols may be USED as symbols, as cascading
streams of green pouring dawn across a screen. Nothing is absolute or fixed. No destiny,
no reality, AND NO RELIGION. All may be used to see the truer truth of our condition. In
this context all that is meaningless once more becomes meaningFULL. The Matrix references
MANY religious concepts from Kirkagard's leap of faith to a Buddhist sunyata or emptiness.
And it is ultimately through these concepts and NOT through the bullets that resistence is
achieved. So the moral of the story:
Don't throw away any potentially useful ways of knowing (just as
you wouldn't throw away any perfectly good M-16s) that you may find on the path. Because
walking the path is moving through symbolic systems, ways of knowing, subways, lobbies,
and other simulated and unreal things that amazingly and mystically always bring one
closer to an ultimate truth.
------------------
Those who believe in substantiality are like cows;
those who believe in emptiness are worse.
- Saraha (9th cent. CE)
|
12321
Member |
posted
04-27-99 02:58 PM
Metaconstrux: Ive gotta read that about a dozen more times
before I can even hope to offer an intelligible comment.
Neophile-: You heard. Im impressed. Youve got
passion, and thats a precious thing, but its sometimes hard to listen when the
passion is flowing. Scroll back and youll see that Ive gotten sidetracked on
my own thang a few times too. [especially in the original Imagery and Metaphor thread]
Dont sweat it.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-27-99 03:06 PM
Metaconstrux: AMEN BROTHER!
12321: Thanks!
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Stealth111
Member |
posted
04-27-99 06:46 PM
Re: Neo as Christ figure...
Anybody notice that Agent Smith is the only one who
"hates." The other agents are merely programs meant to carry out a function.
They go after Neo, Trinity, Morpheus, and the like simply because that is their function.
No good or evil attached to it. But Agent Smith is the only one who has
"evolved" emotion of the three...that emotion being "hate." The
perfect anti-Christ figure. But also the most human of the three agents (again the trinity
shows up).
Just a random thought....
PeaCe |
12321
Member |
posted
04-27-99 07:27 PM
Stealth111: About that evolved notion...
Smith sends the other two agents away, takes out his earpiece
[hardwire connection to the Matrix?] and gives Morpheus the Im going to be
honest with you speech [filled with his own hate and needs] while Neo
and Trinity begin blasting their way in.
Then the other two agents return to the room:
Agent Brown [to Smith]: What were you doing?
Agent Jones [seeing the disconnected ear piece]: He doesn't know.
Agent Smith [putting his earpiece back in]: Know what?
Three agents. Nine words. Dual meanings.
Good observation, Stealth.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
cecilc
Member |
posted
04-27-99 07:36 PM
It's incredible to me how "random thoughts" turn into
gems in this thread! Wow!...
Of course, this leads into MY random thinking! First off, let me
say that my latest thinkings are NOT,...I repeat,...NOT to dismiss or repute or disparage
or in any way, shape, or form cut into Mike's ideas regarding the end of the movie being a
prelude to the 2nd coming! But I've had an inkling in this direction.....
Suppose instead of the 2nd coming, we begin to move into the Book of Acts? The Word now
needs to be spread within the Matrix that you CAN be SAVED - IF YOU WANT TO! You can be
released from the bondage that you REALLY live in and be free! And to do that, you have to
talk to this particular group (our favorite group!), because that's the ONLY way for you
to be saved! No one else can do it! You certainly can't do it on your own - you need help!
So,...are we headed for the "...no one comes to the Father but through me."
parallel, too?!
And,...and...how will the general population of the Matrix respond to that message?!
As always,...I can't wait for comments!
------------------
Reach me at:
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/mission/81 "The Matrix as Messiah" web page
cecilc@mindspring.com
|
12321
Member |
posted
04-27-99 09:59 PM
Cecil: Thats quite a disclaimer youve got there. And
thats a really good connection youre making. I agree, I can see it clearly,
and it makes sense, except for one thing...
Seems like theres gonna be a knock-down, drag-out fight
between the two factions in the third movie [if the seconds a prequel] and that
means somebodys gonna lose big time.
You see where Im going with this?
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
Ev
Member |
posted
04-28-99 01:21 AM
Just saw this amazing film for the first time -- wow. I've read
through this thread and appreciate the thoughtful discussion happening here.
I noticed mention of this once before but didn't notice any
follow-up or replies: the children of Zion (those never 'plugged in'). I thought these
could represent the Jewish people - those in original covenant with God. Any thoughts on
this? |
12321
Member |
posted
04-28-99 06:40 AM
Ev: I think thats a pretty cool explanation, especially
considering how others have linked Abraham to Morpheus When the Matrix was
first built, there was a man born inside who had the ability to change whatever he wanted,
to remake the matrix as he saw fit. It was he who freed the first of us, taught us the
truth.
Maybe Im not getting some obvious connection, but that just
doesnt feel right.
When the Matrix was first built... In the movie,
Morpheus says thats mid 21st century. In this thread, it would be... when? The
expulsion from the Garden? The original covenant with God? About two thousand years ago?
Sometime in this century? Sometime in our future?
If we accept the fact that allegories do break down at certain
points, this may or may not be one of those examples. Each time I shift my reference frame
to ponder those questions, answers appear, as do new questions.
The only answer that fits [for me] is one that cant be
bound by the concept of linear time. And that makes it real hard to put into words right
now. Ill keep using 3 in 1 Oil to lubricate my heart and soul to help my mind find
the words to bridge this gap. Until then, I leave this for you to ponder and ask others to
comment as well.
----- ----- -----
Metacortex
Heart O the City
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
OnFyre4God
Member |
posted
04-28-99 04:00 PM
On Gold: I didn't notice anything on Neo's chest, but there was
apart where I noticed Morpheus wearing a gold neclace of some sort. Also, notice that
Neo's jacket, the agent's jackets, and maybe others that I didn't notice are underlaid
with gold material.
On the "deployed line" that picked up Neo: Didn't it
seem like "the heavens were opened" when the line came down? Also, the square
hatch that opened for the "deployed line" was surrounded by three circles. The
square and the circles all emitted an intense bright light.
Neophile:
1) I 'm not saying my way is the only way. I'm saying that JESUS is the only way, that's
not my philosophy, that is God's Truth!
2) Your absolutely right, your god will never judge you, because
your god does not exist. Your god is a figment of your imagination. If you will display
you e-mail address or e-mail me, we can discuss this by that route. Otherwise, I will
continue to respond to your pholosophies via this forum. (and I really don't wan't to
waste anymore room in here.)
Bye-bye now!
------------------
Repent! The Kingdom of Heaven is at Hand!
Only One God |
Vims
Member |
posted
04-29-99 02:10 AM
Like, so what is red and what is blue?
by Edwin Chan, a friend of mine ...
What is red
and who is blue
the Pimpernel;
my jilted honey-poo.
My honey-poo is all upset
`cos she sees just one ol' hue.
It's true!
Anyway, like seriously
is it that you're getting at
us men, we see too much?
Like, I'm the sculptor man
I sez, just stand back
and see, don't touch!
Comparing a Polish-pair auteur
to shiftless human memory;
Reducing the mechanics of critique
to trite and visual generality
is brave to say the least.
Red and blue
`tis blood and glory
`tis Plato and rhetoric;
`Tis gender, morality,
good and evil
`Tis everything most basic.
In short, I'll have to say,
my Zen-surfing poetic friend -
leave the post-modern theories to
those who CAN pretend. |
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-29-99 06:52 AM
OnFyre:
Uh, okay -- whatever. If you want to be that closed-minded, that's your biz. I have a very
close relationship with GOD -- which, by the way, there is ONLY ONE OF. My God DOES exist
because I exist. I am a part of God (which, by the way, is EVERYBODY'S God) . . . we are
all created from that source -- Do you get what I'm saying? Probably not. But, that's
cool. I don't want to waste any more time with this here either. . . but I'll end with
this:
My point (and problem with one-sided thinking) is that organized religion (or people who
claim THEIR way/savior/whatever is the ONLY way) are like Cypher eating that steak. He
only knew it tasted delicious because the "system" told him so. There were
infinite possibilities out there, and infinite ways for him to experience that steak, but
he chose the path of "ignorance is bliss." Others of us that see the bigger
picture realize that we don't need someone to tell us the steak tastes good; we just need
the nourishment of the "goop," because it has everything the body (soul) needs,
and if we are truly enlightened, we don't need to be told by someone else what it tastes
like . . . it has infinite possibilities (Tasty Wheat, runny eggs, snot, whatever). I wish
you well, my friend -- but I'm afraid the Matrix has you.
Morpheus: "You have to understand, most of these people are
not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the
system that they will fight to protect it."
FREE YOUR MIND.
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-29-99 06:54 AM
OnFyre:
Uh, okay -- whatever. If you want to be that closed-minded, that's your biz. I have a very
close relationship with GOD -- which, by the way, there is ONLY ONE OF. My God DOES exist
because I exist. I am a part of God (which, by the way, is EVERYBODY'S God) . . . we are
all created from that source -- Do you get what I'm saying? Probably not. But, that's
cool. I don't want to waste any more time with this here either. . . but I'll end with
this:
My point (and problem with one-sided thinking) is that organized religion (or people who
claim THEIR way/savior/whatever is the ONLY way) are like Cypher eating that steak. He
only knew it tasted delicious because the "system" told him so. There were
infinite possibilities out there, and infinite ways for him to experience that steak, but
he chose the path of "ignorance is bliss." Others of us that see the bigger
picture realize that we don't need someone to tell us the steak tastes good; we just need
the nourishment of the "goop," because it has everything the body (soul) needs,
and if we are truly enlightened, we don't need to be told by someone else what it tastes
like . . . it has infinite possibilities (Tasty Wheat, runny eggs, snot, whatever). I wish
you well, my friend -- but I'm afraid the Matrix has you.
Morpheus: "You have to understand, most of these people are
not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the
system that they will fight to protect it."
FREE YOUR MIND.
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-29-99 07:08 AM
OnFyre:
Uh, okay -- whatever. If you want to be that closed-minded, that's your biz. I have a very
close relationship with GOD -- which, by the way, there is ONLY ONE OF. My God DOES exist
because I exist. I am a part of God (which, by the way, is EVERYBODY'S God) . . . we are
all created from that source -- Do you get what I'm saying? Probably not. But, that's
cool. I don't want to waste any more time with this here either. . . but I'll end with
this:
My point (and problem with one-sided thinking) is that organized religion (or people who
claim THEIR way/savior/whatever is the ONLY way) are like Cypher eating that steak. He
only knew it tasted delicious because the "system" told him so. There were
infinite possibilities out there, and infinite ways for him to experience that steak, but
he chose the path of "ignorance is bliss." Others of us that see the bigger
picture realize that we don't need someone to tell us the steak tastes good; we just need
the nourishment of the "goop," because it has everything the body (soul) needs,
and if we are truly enlightened, we don't need to be told by someone else what it tastes
like . . . it has infinite possibilities (Tasty Wheat, runny eggs, snot, whatever). I wish
you well, my friend -- but I'm afraid the Matrix has you.
Morpheus: "You have to understand, most of these people are
not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the
system that they will fight to protect it."
FREE YOUR MIND.
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-29-99 07:11 AM
I know I was trying to make a point, but I really DIDN'T mean to
post that three times -- sorry!!!  |
12321
Member |
posted
04-29-99 08:28 AM
Neophile-: Doesnt that hurt?
Remember this [from 04-27-99 09:36 AM]: You think and feel
deeply. That you care and dont wish to offend is just as obvious. But you cant
point a finger without poking yourself in the eye. Its like gravity. You drop a
rock, its gonna hit the ground. This is one of the things that Jesus [among others]
tried to explain.
Do you understand how this is true?
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-29-99 09:06 AM
12321:
Kinda like "judge not, lest ye be judged?"
I think I get it - I think. I think, therefore I am, confused. I just don't wanna fight
with people about how only one view can be right. Maybe I'll just go hang in the
"Didja Ever Wanna Squeeze a Weasel" board for awhile and unwind my mind!
I do, however, truly value the words and thoughts that have been given -- thanks for
hangin' in there with me. |
Sampson
Member |
posted
04-29-99 09:06 AM
Onfire
whatso ever do you mean by saying neophile's god is only in his imagination?
Did someone brainwash u big time?
12321
I agree yes. Tis basically the message.
But, look who is pointing the fingure.
I don't think Neophile is.
He got dragged in maybe by fire boy, but that will happen. Atleast he is trying to
comunicate.
Onfire boy and Neophile
I don't want to be a bother, but i am interested in hearing what u both have to say
I don't think it would be a waiste of our time. I mean part of the debate is about the
bible here and people's belief systems.
Yes they did have biblical themes in mind very much so when they made the movie, but we
can still dicuss these things
Onfire
I am interested in your opinions on Muslim beliefs and Jewish in particular because they
have their roots in the same area.
Neophile
I love yur beliefs there
they are pretty much one in the same with mine 
You know you know when u can feel the finger in your own eye when
u point it at others.
guys love u all
Sampsonator
cecilc
I had left for awhile cause i don't really share these biblical be all and end all stuff,
but maybe there is some value to me to come here |
Trin3
Member |
posted
04-29-99 09:47 AM
Without getting into it TOO much, I'd like to add my two cents to
what OnFyre and Neophile have been discussing. I see where OnFyre is coming from and I
know that that intensity of faith must be incredible. However, it sets me back when humans
claim to KNOW what is right and what isn't. Who is to say that we are not ALL interpreting
these things (the bible, religion, etc.) wrongly? I think it is important that we try to
see that God might have come to different people in different ways/forms....in ways to
which they could relate. But then again, I_could_be_wrong.
Now to what I was originally going to post...
I saw it AGAIN last night (3rd time, couldn't resist). Just as great as ever. I saw the
pool-of-water-heart thing. To me, it looks like a stretch. It's not water, that's obvious.
It looks more like a leaf or some other trash out of the sewer...and it is not really in
the shape of a heart...more like a triangle (Trinity?) with round corners. But it is
definatley smack in the middle of his chest and couldn't be there for no reason. If it is
supposed to represent a golden heart, what is the significance? Sacred Heart?
And the gold in Neo's jacket....I DID see that, OnFyre.
I also saw the doves in the red-dress-freeze scene. Very cool!
Another thing that got me saying hmmmm:
My friend (OS) gets credit for this one. She said, "Don't you think Trinity and Neo
look a lot alike?" Hmmmm........... |
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-29-99 10:13 AM
Sampson: You rock! Thanks for the shout out. . . it's nice to
know others are listening. I don't mind discussing this, if it doesn't turn into an
argument about right and wrong. THAT IS MY WHOLE ENTIRE BIG A** POINT! Morpheus says
"You must try to stop seeing things as right or wrong . . ." When you divide a
blief into sections that exclude this or that person/group simply because they don't in
believe the book/creator/savior that you do, you create separateness and fear -- when you
see that the entirety of ALLLLLLLLL (planet, rocks, trees, air, matter, and everything
that isn't those things and the spaces in between those things) is the higher power and
that is the source to which we all aspire (and from which we all eminate), there is no
need to be separate from one another. If we are to move forward in our society, lives,
etc., we must come to an understanding that our souls are connected and should try to work
towards a common goal -- one that benefits the small and large, empty and whole, rich and
poor; because that understanding of the WHOLE will make individual superiority a thing of
the past and will steer us towards a world where all benefit in the bigger picture because
it benefits EACH ONE OF US to positively effect our own experiences . . .
UH, I really didn't mean to spout off like that and I hope it's
not too spastic to understand -- I promise I'm looking into getting a computer at home
this weekend (Don't laugh -- I gave my old one to my Mom and haven't gotten a new one yet ) so
that I can wax philosophic all I want and don't rish the wrath of my BOSS here at work!
Oh, and -- not that it matters -- but according to my birth certificate, and numerous
eye-witnesses, I am of the female persuasion! 
Trin3: I dig your insights -- I think we're on the same
wavelenght. Also, I think the idea the "golden heart" on Neo's chest is just
debris from the water is a real possibility. I've seen the film 6 times and can't figure
out any DEEP meaning to it.
------------------
Neophile -~-
|
cecilc
Member |
posted
04-29-99 12:06 PM
May I offer some opinions?!
Sampson: Glad to have you back for awhile. I think it takes a big
man to tell everyone that hes NOT a believer, but still take the time to listen and
learn, especially after the start you had in this thread (no smoke or recriminations
there, just praise!). And, as Mike has said before, coincidence is the language of God -
maybe youre SUPPOSED to be here, Sampson!
Neophile-: Ive read the postings that youve made and
the conversations that youve had with Mike, and it seems to me that God is NOT a
stumbling block with you. You profess a belief in God - A God, THE God, EVERYBODYS
God. My impression is that organized religion (and the associated dogma of
such) and/or Jesus is where the obstacles lay for you. Well, let me tell you that I know
where youre coming from (at least, I think I do!). Before I was a Christian, I had
concerns with organized religion. Now that Im a Christian, I STILL have
concerns with organized religion! I personally dont believe I have a
RELIGION - as a Christian what I have is a personal, spiritual connection with The
Almighty through Jesus. And to me, thats far better and more intense than anything
that religion could provide for me. To me religion is both
impersonal and passive - Jesus is personal AND (as Mike calls it) interactive. And
thats a good situation to have when the Almighty wants to get a point across to you.
Now, as to Jesus......
I think the $64,000 question is, Do you believe that Christ is the Son of God with
all the Divinity and Authority of God?. MY answer is probably pretty evident! :-)
(and I KNOW what your answer is, OnFyre,...thank you!) However, if ones answer is
NO, then I can see where one would have an immense problem with Jesus saying, I am
the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father but through me. And
if thats the case, then thats fine - Im certainly not here to argue and
bash your belief system. All I can say is, Maybe one day youll say Yes! to that
question (and collect your $64,000!). :-) Also, Neophile-, after reading these last couple
of thoughts and maybe understanding where Im coming from, you might be able to see
that its not so much close-mindedness from OnFyre as it is the belief
that Christ speaks with the authority of God when He says, I am the way.....
And again, this is not the dogma of organized religion speaking - it comes
from God (hopefully, the same God that we ALL believe in!).
Does this make sense? And have I read your postings correctly? If not, please let me know
- believe me, I have two daughters that dont hesitate AT ALL to let me know when
Im wrong, so Im kinda used to it!
OnFyre,......I truly admire your passion for your beliefs
(youre about as on the sleeve as they get!). And as a Christian, I see
the points youre making and say, Amen. But when you try to force feed people, you
gotta expect em to throw up on you occasionally!
My apologies for being a little wordy, here, but........
------------------
Reach me at:
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/mission/81 "The Matrix as Messiah" web page
cecilc@mindspring.com
|
12321
Member |
posted
04-29-99 03:11 PM
Coincidence IS one of the languages of God.
I want to second Cecils remarks re: organized religion.
This is from an email I sent recently:
religion... i think thats become the dirtiest word in
the english language. its like the word meek. the archaic definition of
meek is: kind; gentle. the modern definition is: spineless; weak. pejoration happens...
and it's worse than sh_t! [maybe i should turn that into a bumper sticker]
I go to church, but my beliefs arent defined by that
building or the sign in front. On 042299 in part 2 of this thread I posted [in part]:
Ive got a personal relationship with someone I call
God. Its not a philosophy. Its not a religion, patchwork or otherwise.
Its a deeply spiritual connection that results in two way communication out here in
the physical world. I ask, seek, and knock [as per the instructions] and I get
answers.
Im not knocking religious organizations and I dont
believe Cecil is either. Im just saying that when others define me as
religious, theyve COMPLETELY misunderstood me.
----- ----- -----
pejoration
[linguistics] The process by which the semantic status of a word changes for the worse,
over a period of time. For example, egregious, which formerly meant distinguished or
remarkable, has come to mean conspicuously bad or flagrant.
-- American Heritage Dictionary
----- ----- -----
Trin3: I was thinking of the heart as more of an abstract
representation. The shape you describe is the shape I remember seeing. The guys who made
this film are artists. If it were simply a piece of debris, I would expect them to use
more than one piece to reinforce the idea. But by placing it in the center of the
protagonists chest, and to show it in only this one brief scene...
I think its safe to assume theres some significance
to this object.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
12321
Member |
posted
04-29-99 03:28 PM
Cecil: I got all fired up by your post and forgot to say so. Well
said, friend.
And wordy? Heck, I wish you had more time to post. I'm a fan.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
12321
Member |
posted
04-29-99 05:06 PM
Trin3: Forgot to answer your question... Sacred Heart? That would
seem to fit.
I threw out Metacortex and Heart O the City yesterday just
to see if anyone would pick up on the symbolism. You know, does Neo think or feel his way?
Of course no one does one or the other exclusively. No one
except...
Thinking alone is akin to the AI in this parable. Thinking
compounded by twisted feeling [hate] is the ultimate villain, as Stealth111 deftly pointed
out. The counterpoint has to be someone with a Heart of Gold. His vision has to be the
Golden Dream. [well see if Im right about that in the third movie]
There is a way that object on his chest can be [symbolic] debris
and still have meaning. It even has a name, of sorts...
The stone the builders rejected [Psalm 118:22]
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
acrobat
Member |
posted
04-29-99 07:09 PM
What great reading these last 5 or 6 posts have been!
12321 and cecilc: You just can't separate "spiritual"
from "religious" any more deftly than you two have done! Thank you and congrats
for those posts! (12321, I DID go back and read your full post that you referred to). I,
too, belive that the "common" MISconception about Christians is that they are
thought to be (by definition, I guess) "religious"!
I've only seen this movie once (imagine that!), but I don't remember seeing any
"religion" at work in the film, but there was a lot of "faith" at work
here.
Carry on!
------------------
He who has ears to hear, let him hear. |
megapolis 2.0
Member |
posted
04-29-99 09:12 PM
I agree with acrobat
12321,
I was wonderng where you were.
Lately I feel like one of them from "Close Encounter of the
3rd kind" where a group of average citizens suddenly were drawn to this clandestine
'HIGHER POWER=BEING'. is like They can't seem to figuer out what is happening to them, but
they feel the dynamics of it and know how important it is to go on with the agenda. BTW I
am not talking about extraterrestrials here.
I am kind of at this place
like that right now.... Like the message center just switched on the Advan-expand mode
toggle.
|
Neophile-
Member |
posted
04-30-99 11:21 AM
"Every day people are straying away from church and going
back to God."
-Lenny Bruce
I really enjoyed your reply, Cecilc -- it actually hit me just
right. I agree that the problem may be in the definition of these problematic simplistic
things we call words. Above all, I just want to say, it is the FEELING of that grander
spirit in each of us that is of utmost importance. To experience our soul's desire
(spiritually) because of a connection to God is the ultimate, and I THINK that ties into
what you're saying.
Peace out. |
cecilc
Member |
posted
04-30-99 02:15 PM
Nicely said, Neophile-. And, yes, I think you've confirmed what I
talked about in the first half of my post concerning God. Can you now address the second
half of my post concerning Christ? I'm interested in your insights regarding His presence.
------------------
Reach me at:
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/mission/81 "The Matrix as Messiah" web page
cecilc@mindspring.com
|
Sampson
Member |
posted
04-30-99 02:26 PM
Okay sorry I gotta say it though
I have little interest in your $64,000 dollar question. I picked
up my money at the desk and was pickpocketed on the way out cause I said we are all the
childern of God and we all contain the Divinity and Authority of God.
Jesus is an excelent choice of a path back to this divinity
though. It just isn't my path. I can't even really say that though. I have read some
Christian mystisism and that is stuff is great. The Bible speaks volumes, but it has been
so misinterpetted at times through history and even revised in ways that change the
meaning. I like the red letter King James ver myself. These really new translations really
cut into meaning in a way.
My only concern is that there are those who get all hairy and say
Jesus is the only path to god and I say load of kaka. Hmmm some confrentation there... I
hope if i say i don't agree in a nice way that we can get along well though 
Onfyre could u please elaborate on neophiles imaginary god not
judging her... because... it is imaginary...
I have had visions and i tell u many people have just cause they weren't in the bible or
don't follow the bible doesn't mean they are imaginary.
We can learn here if we are willing to listen to eachother
Neophile i don't mind u speaking for me one bit
Sampson Short hair and still truckin |
tracer
Member |
posted
04-30-99 02:55 PM
I have been trying to relate the themes of this film to the human
condition, and specifically to my own understanding (or perception) of Truth and Reality;
trying to describe this Life from a Matrix-based perspective. My journey on this path has
barely begun, but let me see if I can put into words some of my initial insights.
I believe the Matrix is representative of this life. We perceive
a reality that we cannot escape. Like Neo, we may sense the existence of an existence
beyond this life. We may have visions, dreams, or revelations that provide an awareness
of, or even a glimpse of, this other existence. However, these moments will always be as
through a veil, clouded and partially obscured. We cannot see clearly because our eyes
have not yet opened. If we remain alive and breathing, we are by definition bound to this
Matrix; still plugged in so to speak. We are born into this condition, and
remain so throughout our life (as defined by this reality).
This other existence is our Self as defined and
created by God; it is our soul, our eternal being. The present physical manifestation of
that soul is but a projection of my true spiritual self, just as for Neo, Your
appearance now is what we call residual self image. It is the mental projection of your
digital self.
Death is the only means by which we escape from the Matrix of
this reality. Death is not an end of life, but only an end of my participation in this
present simulation. Through death I will unplug, and experience
for the first time the Truth. My eyes will finally be opened. I will know myself, my Self,
as I really am (just as Neo did the moment he experienced awareness in the pod). I will
see God, my creator, face to face, much as Neo saw Morpheus for the first time in the
flesh.
My previous existence, my life in this present reality, will
become as a dream. What of his Matrix reality did Neo carry with him out of the pod (a
symbol of our physical, earthly existence)? Only his memories and experiences. His career,
his belongings, his apartment, his identification; all were digital illusions. I
have these memories from my life. None of them happened. What we experience in this
life is not real, in the sense of eternal or everlasting. All is transitory. Yet all is
not without meaning or significance!
It was through Neos digital existence that he experienced
an awareness of the truth, pursued this awareness, and ultimately responded to the
invitation (the red pill). What, then, is the purpose for this present reality, this
Matrix?
More to come
------------------
"It's the question that drives us..." |
cecilc
Member |
posted
04-30-99 02:59 PM
:-) Sampson, you and I get along just fine! :-)
But you gotta help me understand something, Sampson. Why does
Christ scare people so badly? We talk about God,...yeah, that's OK! People like God,
beieve in God, want to BE God. But,....bring Christ into the picture,...whoa, it's clam up
time! I'm just not getting it, Sampson,...help me out!
------------------
Reach me at:
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/mission/81 "The Matrix as Messiah" web page
cecilc@mindspring.com
|
12321
Member |
posted
04-30-99 04:36 PM
Once upon a time, a guy named Cecil saw a movie and thought,
Gee! That story sure seemed like the story of the Messiah. And he said so in
public.
----- ----- -----
No one claims this movie proves or disproves any particular
belief system. The idea in this thread [The Matrix as Messiah Movie] is that the movie
appears to parallel the story of Jesus. Yes [for the umpteenth time] there are other
influences, but to the guy who opened this thread, the story of Christ seemed to stand
out. Thats what brought many of us here. We think so too.
I cant speak for anyone else, but I sure would like to
return to the topic. And as I said a little while back: Each of us has our own
truths and beliefs and questions, and its good to discuss and share em, but
that isnt the primary topic of this thread. Maybe if we recognize and allow for
these differences while we explore the Messiah theme, well all see something
new.
What is the purpose of trashing opposing viewpoints?
To those who feel it their calling to do so, may I suggest
opening a topic entitled My belief system can beat up your belief system.
I think this forum is a tremendous opportunity to explore ideas.
I desperately want to return to that quixotic place we seemed to discover before the
bickering set in.
Im as guilty as anyone. I got sucked into it too. Im
sorry.
Now, if anyone has an objection to returning to the theme, tell
me what it is. If your objection is, But that guy called my belief system a pile of
poo poo. SO WHAT? Not everyone is going to agree with you or you or you or me. SO
WHAT? Were not here to agree. Were here to explore. And the topic of this
thread is The Matrix as Messiah Movie.
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BELIEVE IN A MESSIAH TO EXPLORE OR TAKE PART.
Its just an idea, people. Enjoy it as a thought experiment
if nothing else.
----- ----- -----
Once upon a time, a guy named Cecil saw a movie and thought,
Gee! That story sure seemed like the story of the Messiah. And he said so in
public.
----- ----- -----
No one claims this movie proves or disproves any particular
belief system. The idea in this thread [The Matrix as Messiah Movie] is that the movie
appears to parallel the story of Jesus. Yes [for the umpteenth time] there are other
influences...
[repeat as needed]
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
cecilc
Member |
posted
04-30-99 04:56 PM
Point made,...hint taken to heart! Whatever happened to that guy,
Cecil?!
Along the line of this thread (a wry grin here!), I'm going to
see the movie again tommorrow. Among several things I'm going to look for is the piece of
"whatever" on Neo's chest as he's hauled up out of the water toward the Neb.
Loved your post, tracer.
Thanks, Mike!
------------------
Reach me at:
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/mission/81 "The Matrix as Messiah" web page
cecilc@mindspring.com
|
tracer
Member |
posted
05-01-99 02:25 AM
Here is a complete version of what I started a few posts back.
Pardon the partial repetition, but I made a few changes and wanted to present my thoughts
as a single, connected stream.
I have been trying to relate the theme of this film to the human
condition, and specifically to my own understanding (or perception) of Truth and reality;
trying to describe this life from a Matrix-based perspective. My journey on this path has
barely begun, but let me see if I can put into words some of my initial insights.
I believe the Matrix is representative of this worldly life. We
perceive a reality from which we cannot escape. Like Neo, we may sense the existence of an
existence beyond this life. We may have visions, dreams, or revelations that provide an
awareness of, or even a glimpse of, this other existence. However, these moments will
always be as through a veil, clouded and partially obscured. We cannot see clearly because
our eyes are not yet opened; and much as we may be philosophically open to the Truth, full
realization is impossible. It is not enough to want it, and we remain unsatisfied even if
we seek it. If we are alive and breathing, we are by definition still bound to this
Matrix; still plugged in so to speak. We are born into this condition, and
remain so throughout our life (in the temporal/mortal sense).
This other existence is our Self as defined and
created by God; it is our soul, our eternal being. The present physical manifestation of
that soul is but a projection, a DNA-based hologram, of my true spiritual self. As
Morpheus explained to Neo, Your appearance now is what we call residual self image.
It is the mental projection of your digital self.
Death is the only means by which we are released from the Matrix
of this reality. Death is not an end of life, but only an end of my participation in this
present simulation. Through death I will unplug, and experience
for the first time the Truth. My eyes will finally be opened. I will know myself, my true
Self, as I really am, just as Neo did the moment he experienced awareness in the pod. I
will see God, my creator, face to face, much in the same way that Neo was greeted by
Morpheus for the first time in the flesh. Welcome to the real world
My previous existence, my life in this present reality, will
become as a dream. What of his Matrix reality did Neo carry with him out of the pod (a
symbol of our physical, earthly existence)? Only his memories and experiences. His career,
his belongings, his apartment, his identification; all were digital illusions. I
have these memories from my life. None of them happened. What we experience in this
life is not real, in the sense of eternal or everlasting. All is transitory. Yet all is
not without meaning or significance!
It was through Neos digital existence that he experienced
an awareness of the truth, pursued this awareness, and ultimately responded to the
invitation to commit himself to the truth (the red pill). What, then, is the purpose for
this present reality, this Matrix? I believe it is an opportunity to pursue the awareness
of Himself (the splinter in our mind) that God has planted in the heart of each of us.
Romans 1: 19, because that which is known about God is evident within them; for God
made it evident to them. It is an opportunity to seek God, and respond to His
invitation to enter into a relationship with Him.
For this reason, everything we experience in this reality is
significant; not in and of itself, but because of where it leads us. We experience love so
that we may come to understand Gods love for us. We experience suffering so that we
may understand the significance of the Cross. We experience loss in order to understand
the anguish of separation from God. We are given the opportunity to make decisions and
experience the consequences in order to understand the nature of sin and wrath. We are
given the opportunity to forgive others in order to understand the grace of God.
Most importantly, we are given the opportunity to make a choice;
do we accept the invitation and follow the white rabbit (the Lamb of God)? This decision
is the primary purpose for our entire existence in this Matrix. This decision determines
which reality we will experience as a spiritual being for all eternity. Matthew 25: 46,
Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal
life. And, like Neo, we must make this decision with our eyes still closed (but our
mind open)! We must make this decision as one still plugged into the Matrix, without all
the answers, without certainty of what the Truth is. Because of this, it is a decision of
faith. WHO DO YOU TRUST? Think about it; what caused Neo to heed the advice of a cryptic
and unexplainable message on his computer screen? What caused him to stay in a car with
strangers who were pointing a gun in his face? What caused him to take the red pill? I say
again, WHO DO YOU TRUST?
So, fellow coppertops, what are we to do? 2 Corinthians 4: 18,
So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is
temporary, but what is unseen is eternal. If you are reading this, your journey has
already begun

------------------
"It's the question that drives us..." |
nilent
Member |
posted
05-01-99 02:37 AM
What is a Messiah? Seriously.
Neo isn't "redeeming" the "sins" ot the
podpeople, is he?
Messiah as Hero......leader? Source of All?
Or is that His Father?
His? Such sexist anthropomorphism eh ? :-)
Yes of course the Matrix encompasses much that is Messianic in
it's imagry/metaphor.......but I believe the movie is something *more/else*.
None the less; some good stuff here.......the very fact that so
many brain/heart cells have been fired up is a testament to the positive potency of this
fine flick. |
cecilc
Member |
posted
05-01-99 06:02 AM
nilent,...
If you're looking for a "book" definition of Messiah (of course, you're going to
get the references to BOTH Judaism and Christianity in that definition!), but another
definition means "any expected savior or liberator of a people, country, etc."
(this according to Mr. Webster!)
So I think you're right that, NO, Neo is not actually "redeeming" any
"sin" in the podpeople. However, in this case, he is playing the role of
"liberator" because he has become freer to walk inside the Matrix without fear
(a little "of the world but not part of the world" sort of thing!) to help
people wake up and live a "real" life! Now, that "real" life may not
be as comfortable as the "pod" life (witness Cypher!), but at least these people
will know reality! So I think the Messiah label for Neo still holds up!
Cecil out
------------------
Reach me at:
http://thematrix.acmecity.com/mission/81 "The Matrix as Messiah" web page
cecilc@mindspring.com
|
12321
Member |
posted
05-01-99 06:18 AM
nilent: The Messiah is the one who is able to do something that
no one else can. In breaking free, this individual is then able to free others.
The movie doesnt skirt this issue. One guy has to open the
door. No one else can do it. The guy who does it is the Messiah.
Make sense?
That others dont like this interpretation is puzzling to
me. If Cecil had called this The Matrix as Hero Movie no one would have
objected. But to link the Hero to Christ sets people off. Go figure.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
12321
Member |
posted
05-01-99 06:21 AM
Oops, didn't see you get in ahead of me, Cecil. Sorry for the
repetition.
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
Sampson
Member |
posted
05-01-99 06:36 AM
hmmm
I can say right off the top of my head that many organizations
have put alot of energy into undermining Jesus and his message. Since they have succeeded
in many ways they have been fertalizing this fear and trying to make it grow.
I for one would love to meet Jesus in human form. I think we
could go have a beautiful picnic in the park or something like that.
I think he would be realy easy to get along with
Sampson |
12321
Member |
posted
05-01-99 06:38 AM
nilent: One more thing. The story of the Messiah is about
reunification with the Source. Its about the end of one stage of existence and the
beginning of another. Its about the conquest of death and the beginning of life
everlasting.
Try to push aside religious notions, translate that
into terms youre more comfortable with, and tell me, please. What is *more* than
that?
------------------
mike skocko
http://www.ix625.com |
12321
Member |
posted
05-01-99 07:10 AM
And about that *more* than that question... Im
not trying to be a smart-as_, Im a | |